![]() I think most of the time the reason that controlling the center is given as advice is that it give those who don't know what they are doing something to strive for. would this not mean that controlling the center is a good goal? ![]() So Player A controlled the center and won. Not to mention the queenside influence they also have from there. However, if black were to control the e5, e4, d5, or d4 squares and say put a knight there and a bishop somewhere near there, they would be slicing through those weaknesses effortlessly by putting a piece in the center, if he has control of it. If the center was closed there is a good chance (though by no means certain) that black couldn't use the weaknesses on your king because he wouldn't have any good posts on the kingside, at least if the squares behind the pawns are controlled. Say you weaken your king with f4, g4, and h3 with an open center. Sometimes opening the center favors one player or not another, but you always have to be careful about that. ![]() When there is possible ways to open up the center or change the central pawn structure, it always has to be strongly considered. Well, control of the center does many things: it gains space, gets your pieces to effective squares with minimal effort, gives your rooks the most influence, stuff like that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |